> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE)
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:48:28 +0000
>
> It's because intra-area LSAs are preferred compared to inter-area LSAs.
> The super-backbone(MP-BGP->OSPF) introduces LSAs from the remote site as
> Type-3 into the LSDB of a local PE and if the local PE happens to have a
> Type-1 LSA from a directly connected link than that one is preferred. So you
> can either make both LSAs to appear as Type-1 using sham-link or you can make
> both to be type-3 using different areas on each site.
>
> Or you can use BGP as everyone else and can forget about all this mess above.
>
Thanks everyone for the replies - much appreciated (And thanks Adam for the
explanation above)
Can anyone please point me to a doc/other on how to manipulate the routes if
using BGP (In place of OSPF) to have traffic behave "correctly"?
Cheers.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
