LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics for layer 2 and 3 are auto config'd and auto Added according to brocade.
-------------------------------------------- On Wed, 6/18/14, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 139, Issue 21 To: [email protected] Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 9:03 AM Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to [email protected] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [email protected] You can reach the person managing the list at [email protected] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Harry Hambi - Atos) 2. Re: Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Darren O'Connor) 3. Re: BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE) (Vitkovsk? Adam) 4. Re: Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Nick Hilliard) 5. Re: Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Clement Cavadore) 6. Which IOS version for 1841 router can use PPPOE on sub-interface? (PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX) 7. 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical Cable (Gilles Fabre) 8. Re: 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical Cable (Andrew Miehs) 9. Re: 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical Cable (Azher Mughal) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:34:09 +0000 From: Harry Hambi - Atos <[email protected]> To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic Message-ID: <f05d03e557a94948a0c4a6b2311eaa12573e7...@bgb01xud1014.national.core.bbc.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi All, I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics . I'me told there is a command that will enable these Gbics to work in a Cisco chassis, is this this the case ?, If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in advance Rgds Harry Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:46:05 +0100 From: "Darren O'Connor" <[email protected]> To: Harry Hambi - Atos <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" service unsupported-transceiver Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:34:09 +0000 > Subject: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic > > Hi All, > I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics . I'me told there is a command that will enable these Gbics to work in a Cisco chassis, is this this the case ?, > If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in advance > > > > Rgds > Harry > > Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:48:28 +0000 From: Vitkovsk? Adam <[email protected]> To: CiscoNSP List <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE) Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" It's because intra-area LSAs are preferred compared to inter-area LSAs. The super-backbone(MP-BGP->OSPF) introduces LSAs from the remote site as Type-3 into the LSDB of a local PE and if the local PE happens to have a Type-1 LSA from a directly connected link than that one is preferred. So you can either make both LSAs to appear as Type-1 using sham-link or you can make both to be type-3 using different areas on each site. Or you can use BGP as everyone else and can forget about all this mess above. adam > -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > CiscoNSP List > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:12 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [c-nsp] BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE) > > Hi Everyone, > > We typically use OSPF (CE/PE) so customer can advertise routes into their > VRF - We have issues with failover (When customer site has 2 links) but the > links go to different PE"s of ours (We only have agg's from carriers on certain > PE's).. > > eg. > > Customer(vrf) has a site(foo) connected to PE A + B (PE B is "failover" link) > > Same customer has another site(bar) connected to PE B. > > Traffic from site "bar" to "foo" will go via PE B, which is not what we > want...we have manipulated this to work via longer subnets (i.e. failover link > advertising a /23 instead of a /24), but this isnt always feasible. > > Would BGP(Instead of OSFP) help in this situation...i.e. Can we manipulate > how the routes are advertised(PE A/B) within the vrf more easily if the CE > advertises via BGP vs OSPF? Or any other suggestions? > > Cheers > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:50:37 +0100 From: Nick Hilliard <[email protected]> To: Harry Hambi - Atos <[email protected]>, "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 18/06/2014 09:34, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: > I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics . I'me told there is a > command that will enable these Gbics to work in a Cisco chassis, is this > this the case ?, If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in > advance ios: service unsupported-transceiver no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid xr: service unsupported-transceiver interface x/y/z transceiver permit pid all Nick ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:43:45 +0200 From: Clement Cavadore <[email protected]> To: Harry Hambi - Atos <[email protected]> Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic Message-ID: <1403081025.850.108.camel@puisard> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Hi, On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 08:34 +0000, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote: > I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics . I'me told there is a command that will enable these Gbics to work in a Cisco chassis, is this this the case ?, > If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in advance service unsupported-transceiver ? -- Cl?ment Cavadore ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:31:00 +0700 From: PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Subject: [c-nsp] Which IOS version for 1841 router can use PPPOE on sub-interface? Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Which IOS version for 1841 router can use PPPOE on sub-interface? Thank you very much. ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:37:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Gilles Fabre <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Subject: [c-nsp] 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical Cable Message-ID: <2003883958.54861403091463742.JavaMail.www@wwinf7114> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all ?I have been searching for 40G to 4*10G cables (not DAC/Twinax but optical ones). ?Did you ever use such cables ? is it reliable ? ?I did not find any monomode ones, I guess this is not existing... any idea why (strength of signal ?) ? Thanks & best regards Gilles ? ___________________________________________________________ Mode, hifi, maison,? J'ach?te malin. Je compare les prix avec Voila.fr http://shopping.voila.fr/ ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:41:15 +1000 From: Andrew Miehs <[email protected]> To: Gilles Fabre <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical Cable Message-ID: <CAKf7gMCAbdUhVXMjGqVHJABbMvqGqr2WHHLh=szu9A18u=f...@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Was looking at this a while ago - but haven't had a chance to try any of it - no one has bought me any 40G kit yet... >From Cisco - for Multimode - Cisco QSFP-40G-SR4 - This terminates on a MPO-12 plug which you can connect to 4x 10G SR Unfortunately Cisco doesn't make a single mode version - but I found - these from Arista - don't know if they work though - QSFP-40G-PLR4 and QSFP-40G-PLRL4 Good luck, and if you do get to try it out - please keep us informed. Regards Andrew On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Gilles Fabre <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all > > I have been searching for 40G to 4*10G cables (not DAC/Twinax but optical > ones). > Did you ever use such cables ? is it reliable ? > I did not find any monomode ones, I guess this is not existing... any > idea why (strength of signal ?) ? > > Thanks & best regards > Gilles > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Mode, hifi, maison,? J'ach?te malin. Je compare les prix avec Voila.fr > http://shopping.voila.fr/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:15:28 -0700 From: Azher Mughal <[email protected]> To: Andrew Miehs <[email protected]>, Gilles Fabre <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical Cable Message-ID: <[email protected]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I don't have Cisco switches with QSFP ports, but have used both SR and LR versions of these breakout cables from Elpeus.com without problems in Dell / Force10. Cheers -Azher On 6/18/2014 5:41 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote: > Was looking at this a while ago - but haven't had a chance to try any of it > - no one has bought me any 40G kit yet... > > From Cisco - for Multimode - Cisco QSFP-40G-SR4 - This terminates on a > MPO-12 plug which you can connect to 4x 10G SR > > Unfortunately Cisco doesn't make a single mode version - but I found - > these from Arista - don't know if they work though - QSFP-40G-PLR4 > and QSFP-40G-PLRL4 > > Good luck, and if you do get to try it out - please keep us informed. > > Regards > > Andrew > > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Gilles Fabre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> I have been searching for 40G to 4*10G cables (not DAC/Twinax but optical >> ones). >> Did you ever use such cables ? is it reliable ? >> I did not find any monomode ones, I guess this is not existing... any >> idea why (strength of signal ?) ? >> >> Thanks & best regards >> Gilles >> >> >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Mode, hifi, maison,? J'ach?te malin. Je compare les prix avec Voila.fr >> http://shopping.voila.fr/ >> _______________________________________________ >> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ ------------------------------ Subject: Digest Footer _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp ------------------------------ End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 139, Issue 21 ****************************************** _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
