Why you say Cisco doesn't see any "longevity" for 4500X? 4500X is here to stay, as part of 4500 family, which itself is also here to stay. Roadmap points far into future.
You can go ahead with 4500X deployments, or experiment with other metro platforms - ME3600/3800 or even 6880. -- ./ > On 2 maj 2014, at 02:20, CiscoNSP List <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a > "core" switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, > so we are looking to upgrade them. > > We run pairs of 4500X's (In VSS) at some other POPs, and are quite happy with > them, but Cisco dont appear to see this platform as having any longevity? > > Hoping for some recommendations on replacement switch(es) for the 3750 - The > 6800's look very nice, but Ive got no idea on price? > > We are a small Service Provider, and primarily provide private > networks(VRF's) to customers - All L3 is currently done on 7200's and ASR1K's > > Cheers. > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
