On 30/04/14 14:19, Mark Mason wrote:
Looking at some potential edge redesign options when comparing 6880-X-XL [larger route table @ 2M IPv4] & ASR1004/1006 platforms. Thinking about leaving the edge routers to ASR's (could be more than 4 carriers - 1 per ASR) and then route-reflecting down to the new L3 core/distribution. Moving the L3 / HSRP from the ASR edge down to the 6880 level and disposing of HSRP. Thoughts? Current designs? Thinking VSS @ the 6880 level good choice/bad choice? Would like to you know your thoughts...
a) A pair 6880s would do the entire job? Why do you need ASR1ks at all? b) I don't think VSS has ever been a good design choice (engage flames) Tom _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
