Hi Christian. I think I get now; I think using "bgp add-path install" installs route in CEF, rather than route sitting in BGP table only. So no waiting on best path selection process. But I don't think it's sitting in RIB, I mean it doesn't use extra TCAM space, only DRAM?
Anyway, thanks all again. Regards On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Christian Meutes <[email protected]>wrote: > On 26 Apr 2014, at 12:50, Cydon Satyr <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I see. But then is there any effect of having repair path installed with > > "bgp additional-paths install" command on platform without Hierarchical > > FIBs or is it purely cosmetic? > > Regardless of PIC through ADD-PATH you can make use of multiple pathes > from same peer which otherwise would been hidden (eg. by route-reflectors). > I guess with "bgp add-path install" you will have the backup prefix at > least > in your RIB and you aren't relying on other speakers convergence. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
