We used LAG bundles on all backbone links as well as peering PNI's. The load balancing hashes were very effective.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Keegan Holley <[email protected]> wrote: > It depends on your platform, traffic and code versions. Aggregated links > and MLAG are the better option since they are simpler. However they are > more susceptible to bugs on certain platforms and traffic spread of course > depends what kind of traffic flows will traversing the links. It's also > easier to remove links from service with ECMP. If you're a transit AS you > probably have enough diversity to ensure an even spread. All things > considered I'd choose aggregated links as well. > > On Mar 13, 2014, at 4:28 PM, Ivan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So we are crossing the bridge to >10Gbps for some MPLS core links. I am > > trying to work out if it is better to use aggregated links or ECMP. If > > anyone has any experience or recommendation it would be much appreciated. > > > > Thanks > > > > Ivan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > -- Bill Blackford Logged into reality and abusing my sudo privileges..... _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
