Hi, Lukas, Am 09.12.2013 um 14:43 schrieb Lukas Tribus <[email protected]>: > Well, why don't you try to remove the redistribution completely: > > no redistribute connected route-map redistribute
But I do want to redistribute all connected subnets into IS-IS. I just want to prevent addresses that do not belong to me from entering the IGP. Think of typing error, local transfer networks on BGP links that belong to my partner instead of me, and the like. Proved useful for v4 and I’m trying to keep it for > Perhaps, the network is redistributed by another mechanism and you are > looking at > the problem from the wrong angle. For that matter: passive-interface in ISIS > has > a different behavior than in OSPF. You nailed it - even if I remove redistribution alltogether, the route shows up on the peers. Thanks. That gives me a direction for further investigation and some reading. >> 12.2(33)SXI12 and 12.2(33)SXJ6 both show this behaviour. Am I missing >> something >> more general, here? Or can it be remotely possible that this is not yet >> implemented [tm]? > > I would suggest you give 15.1(2)SY a try. Didn’t IOS 15 introduce a completely new and rather burdensome licensing mechanism? http://etherealmind.com/ios-15-licensing-how-we-work/ If that article get’s it correctly, I’d rather avoid 15 as long as possible. Kind regards Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 [email protected] http://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
