Looks like the want to be *_very_* sure there traffic flows through as174 :-) M
> -----Original Message----- > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Mark Tinka > Sent: 27 November 2013 04:26 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] %BGP-6-MSGDUMP_LIMIT: unsupported or mal-formatted > message > > On Tuesday, November 26, 2013 10:11:20 PM Saku Ytti wrote: > > > Interestingly, I don't believe this behaviour could be > > seen in IOS-XR or JunOS or such, since it's quite > > untypical for userland process to start processing > > packet before it's received. But IOS specifically has > > dedicated TCP/IP implementation for BGP and another > > implementation for rest of the system. > > While we're on the subject: > > tinka@hmmh# run show route 193.105.15.0 > > inet.0: 466528 destinations, 467107 routes (466496 active, 31 holddown, 1 > hidden) > Restart Complete > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both > > 193.105.15.0/24 *[BGP/170] 4d 21:28:09, MED 90, localpref 110 > AS path: 3257 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 > 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 50404 I > > to a.b.c.d via xe-0/0/2.0 > > [edit] > tinka@hmmh# > > Reeks of Mikrotik to me. > > Mark. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
