On Monday, November 25, 2013 04:55:08 AM Jeff Kell wrote: > We have been using EIGRP in the most recent generation of > our campus network, a choice that was largely made on > the fact that it could load-share across equal-cost > paths, and take the path of "least resistance" to the > target.
I'm guessing you meant "unequal cost" :-). Have you seen this: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/crs/software/crs_r4.3/routing/configuration/guide/b_routing_cg43xcrs_chapter_0101.html#concept_6F7168EEB2D343CCBA82BB223B311E7B I haven't tried it, so don't know if it actually does what it says on the tin. Anyone? Oli? Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
