Hi Yham, Maybe the following URLs can be helpful:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/technologies/tk436/tk428/white_paper_c11-562013.html https://www.dfn.de/fileadmin/3Beratung/DFN-Forum2/118.pdf http://www.ecitele.com/CampaignDocuments/MPLS-TP-IP-MPLS.pdf MPLS-TP is more an alternative for network access; its main purpose is to compete with Metro Ethernet technologies. Alberto -----Original Message----- From: cisco-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yham Sent: November-25-13 6:33 PM To: [email protected] NSP; [email protected] List Subject: [c-nsp] MPLS-TP on CPT platform vs IP/MPLS core on ASR with TE Hi Guys, If a provider already have ciena as transport with ip/mpls core on cisco ASR, why would they want to deploy CPT with mpls-tp? Can we compare mpls-te vs mpls-tp or is this comparison of apples and oranges? I am new to mpls-tp and trying to understand in which area mpls-tp really help. it is said that mpls-tp has better oam features, its ipless but whats wrong if i have ip/mpls core, i have TE that provide all redundancy, can configure diverse paths, reserve bandwidth, all maintenance features like local repair. I will be thankful if you share your thoughts Regards _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
