Hi, that could work: Add the Arin ASN to your RIPE AS-set. Tell Level3 to use the object from RADB instead of RIPE and should have all networks then.
You can check what their prefixgen creates: whois -h filtergen.level3.net RIPE::AS123 kind regards Rolf > Hi Gert > > I´d love to see my unicast network announced from Miami and Madrid :) !! > But I have two different ASN, I don´t know if this is a problem. > No load balancing and yes, I think I have a problem with objects and > Level3. I don´t know how Level3 in US will open their filters for a RIPEs > /24. > > The /24 seems to be announced only from Spain (I searched through one of > my carriers looking glass in Miami and the prefix is seeing only from > Spain). > > cheers! > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 3:33 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 02:06:30PM +0100, JJ wrote: >> > I´m looking to make some tests with anycast(for DDoS mitigation). Does >> > someone tried to achieve this with unicast IPs?. >> > >> > You know it´s not possible to get more IP assignments from RIPE, and >> after >> > asking RIPE for anycast assignments, they told me we still could use >> > unicast for this purpose. >> > It sounds a bit weird to me...but I made a try and configured a /24 >> being >> > announced in our AS(different ASN) in Miami and Madrid(Spain), then I >> just >> > asked my carriers to open their filters and... It doesn´t work. >> > >> > Have you ever tried a configuration like this? (and successful :) ) >> ,or, >> > perhaps, am I trying the impossible? >> >> There are no "anycast" IPs in IPv4. There is just unicast networks >> announced >> from multiple places, and that works great :-) >> >> The "anycast" thing in the RIPE policies is "if you plan to do anycast >> deployment, and have no existing addresses you can use for that, there >> was a special policy to give out /24s from a well-known block for that >> particular purpose". It's still unicast IPs. >> >> If it's not working for you, you're likely missing route: objects (so >> your >> announcements are getting filtered), or you're trying TCP traffic with >> some loadbalancing in the mix, with half the packets going to the one >> site and the other half going to the other site -> TCP won't work. >> >> gert >> -- >> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! >> // >> www.muc.de/~gert/ >> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany >> [email protected] >> fax: +49-89-35655025 >> [email protected] >> > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
