Hi Pshem, output below
switch 1 Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID Status ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- VFI FLVPLS004 vfi 46.226.0.9 4 UP VFI FLVPLS004 vfi 46.226.0.14 4 UP switch 2 Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID Status ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- VFI FLVPLS004 vfi 46.226.0.9 4 UP VFI FLVPLS004 vfi 46.226.0.12 4 UP switch 3 Local intf Local circuit Dest address VC ID Status ------------- -------------------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- VFI FLVPLS004 vfi 46.226.0.12 4 UP VFI FLVPLS004 vfi 46.226.0.14 4 UP We are not using targeted ldp at this time. All switches are using rsvp -- Nick Ryce Fluency Communications Ltd. e. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> w. http://fluency.net.uk/ t. 0845 874 7000 On 19 Nov 2013, at 00:31, Pshem Kowalczyk <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I assume here you're running ME3600x. Split horizon works by stopping any packets that arrived on one pseudowire from leaving on another pseudowire. Attachment circuit to another attachment circuit is not affected (unless you make add them to another split-horizon group manually). Can you show the output of 'sh mpls l2 vc' Do you also run targeted LDP between those devices? kind regards Pshem On 19 November 2013 09:05, Nick Ryce <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi, I’m tearing my hair out with this one and can’t figure out how to resolve it. I have 3 switches that have a BGP signalled VPLS with customer routers hanging off the end of all 3 ( one switch has 2 cpe ) All have the RD 56595:4 and RT 56595:4 All pseudo wires are up between the switches with config snippets below:- Switch 1 VFI name: FLVPLS004, state: up, type: multipoint, signaling: BGP VPN ID: 4, VE-ID: 3, VE-SIZE: 10 RD: 56595:4, RT: 56595:4, 56595:4 Bridge-Domain 903 attachment circuits: Vlan903 Neighbors connected via pseudowires: Interface Peer Address VE-ID Local Label Remote Label S pseudowire100033 46.226.0.9 2 402 39 Y pseudowire100037 46.226.0.14 1 401 49 Y This switch has 1 cpe with any vlan tags stripped and can ping all devices on the other switches Switch 2 VFI name: FLVPLS004, state: up, type: multipoint, signaling: BGP VPN ID: 4, VE-ID: 1, VE-SIZE: 10 RD: 56595:4, RT: 56595:4, 56595:4 Bridge-Domain 11 attachment circuits: Vlan11 Neighbors connected via pseudowires: Interface Peer Address VE-ID Local Label Remote Label S pseudowire100015 46.226.0.12 3 49 401 Y pseudowire100018 46.226.0.9 2 48 37 Y This switch has 2 cpe’s with any vlan tags stripped. They can ping each other and the device connected to switch 1 but cannot ping device on switch 3 Switch 3 VFI name: FLVPLS004, state: up, type: multipoint, signaling: BGP VPN ID: 4, VE-ID: 2, VE-SIZE: 10 RD: 56595:4, RT: 56595:4, 56595:4 Bridge-Domain 4 attachment circuits: Vlan4 Neighbors connected via pseudowires: Interface Peer Address VE-ID Local Label Remote Label S pseudowire100028 46.226.0.12 3 39 402 Y pseudowire100027 46.226.0.14 1 37 28 Y This switch has 1 cpe device connected with any vlan tags stripped and can only ping the device on switch 1 Each switch can see all the correct mac addresses. It sounds like split horizon but I assumed this was only to do with the local switch? All devices are running 15.3(3)S Any help much appreciated. Nick _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
