Hi Pete,

Side A:
l2vpn vfi context TEST
  vpn id 100
  autodiscovery bgp signaling ldp
vlan configuration 47
  member vfi TEST

N7K-M108X2-12L towards both core and CE

Side B:
l2vpn vfi context TEST
  vpn id 100
  autodiscovery bgp signaling ldp
vlan configuration 100
  member vfi TEST

interface Ethernet3/48
  description moni-0q1 gb-2
  switchport
  switchport access vlan 100
  no shut

N7K-M108X2-12L towards core, both N7K-M108X2-12L and N7K-M148GS-11L towards CE

Side A is a VLAN on a vPC, VFI is only configured on one vPC peer. I don't think the issue is vPC related through, I had the same issue when manually linking a VFI on a non-vPC N7k with a 6500 xconnect.

Regards,
Bernhard

Configs and CE facing and core facing line cards?


On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Bernhard Schmidt <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hoi,

    I have started testing VPLS on N7k 6.2(2) with VLAN-based VFI membership
    and I have some problem with IPv6 in the VLAN due to some/most multicast
    frames getting dropped, which breaks neighbor discovery quite badly.
    Unicast and Broadcast seem to be unaffected.

    The topology/configuration is quite simple (only two PEs at the moment)
    and happens with both VPLS BGP Autodiscovery and statically configured
    neighbors. Has anyone already tested that and can share his results? I
    strongly suspect "bug", it's a new feature on the platform after all.

    Thanks,
    Bernhard

    _______________________________________________
    cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
    archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

Reply via email to