On Monday, March 11, 2013 07:07:27 PM Bruce Pinsky wrote: > fall-over basically tears down the peering session as > soon as reachability to the peering address is lost. It > is event-driven rather than timer based session > deactivation. The issue with the feature is that there > is no delay/dampening method and so a momentary loss of > reachability can result in the peer(s) being torn down.
Another issue is that there is no native IPv6 support for the feature. The way Cisco have implemented this for IPv6 is together with BFD. Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
