On (2013-06-24 23:19 -0500), Andrew Brant wrote: > neighbor 192.168.25.7 fall-over route-map RTM-BGP-FALLOVER
Fall-over and next-hop tracking are two distinct features. With next-hop tracking, you simply invalidate the next-hops there by invalidating the routes and choosing next-best option. With fall-over you tear down whole session, this is usually undesirably large hammer, consider your IGP flap is very short, if you tore down the iBGP it might take minutes to recover. But granted, if current version does not support selective next-hop resolution it seems like significantly better than nothing. -- ++ytti _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
