Thanks for pointing that out. It was a copy-paste error on my behalf.
The actual config on BE1.333 matches on 2001+101. And trying to
configure the same matching criteria on two interfaces is rejected by
the router.
//Claes
On 2013-04-08 16:14, Jason Lixfeld wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for hijacking, but I have a completely unrelated question after looking
at your config:
On 2013-04-08, at 5:15 AM, Claes Jansson <[email protected]> wrote:
!
interface Bundle-Ether1.333
vrf test1
ipv4 address 3.3.3.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation dot1q 2001 second-dot1q 102
!
interface Bundle-Ether1.444
encapsulation dot1q 2001 second-dot1q 102
rewrite ingress tag pop 2 sym
!
You are matching the same inner and outer tags twice. I'm confused because I
don't understand under what circumstances frames would be matched by Be1.444
when the frames are already matched and forwarded by Be1.333.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
