Are you terminating to the onboard ethernet port or a WIC? What code version?
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Andy Dills <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm having a weird problem that I can't quite seem to wrap my head around. > > I have customer who has a 2651XM that we're hooking up to a Level3 > (copper) ethernet circuit. Because of the distance between our telco > handoff and his rack, he has about 200 feet. Which shouldn't be a problem. > > However, we were seeing tremendous packet loss. After determining the > errors were coming from this end, and testing and replacing everything in > the path, we finally tried moving the router into the telco handoff room > so we could try to eliminate a lot of variables. With a short patch cable, > it worked fine, no packet loss. > > So, we made a 200 ft cable to simulate the issue, and hooked it up to the > router while it sat next to the Level3 handoff...major packet loss again. > We tried the other fastethernet interface on the 2651...same problem. > > However, if I take that same cable and terminate it into one of our 7200s, > we get zero packet loss. > > In sum: > > This 2651xm with long cable, major packet loss > This 2651xm with short cable, works fine > Our 7200 with the same long cable, works fine > > What's going on here? Is the controller in the 2651xm failing? Perhaps not > producing enough voltage? > > Thanks, > Andy > > --- > Andy Dills > Xecunet, Inc. > www.xecu.net > 301-682-9972 > --- > _______________________________________________ > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
