Hi Gert, Thanks for the reply, I was hoping there was some way to do it with Local-Prefs or weights setting the BGP routes from peers into a group and then selecting that group from the routing table for the internal IP Range I want to use those routes. I presume there is a way to setup VRFs to do this? Or how would that work? I believe VRFs are specific for an MPLS network and I have never touched or set one of those up before.
Thanks Joe On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:14:32AM -0400, Joseph Hardeman wrote: > > I am wondering, is it possible to route traffic based on the Source IP to > > specific BGP learned routes? For instance, if I have IP Range > > 2.2.2.2/24that I want only to use routes learned from peerings with > > say AS 444, 555, > > 666. But I want to have IP Range 2.2.2.3/24 use the routes learned from > > peerings with say AS 111, 222, 333. I know I can do PBR and set the > > next-hop based on the source IP but it appears that even with multiple > > entries in that route-map statement it will choose one out of the list > and > > use that by default and not choose the best path learned from the > neighbors > > I want it too. Can this be done with local-prefs or weights? > > No. > > You'd need to do VRFs (and having a full table in multiple VRFs is going > to eat lots of memory). > > gert > -- > USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! > // > www.muc.de/~gert/ <http://www.muc.de/%7Egert/> > Gert Doering - Munich, Germany > [email protected] > fax: +49-89-35655025 > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
