Hi, On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:51:48AM -0700, Chris Flav wrote: > >I saw this across a few router platforms; so I'm guessing in may me embedded > >in the base IOS code: > >* 7200 > >* 1800 > >* 2600 > > How incredibly annoying. Is there any L2 tunneling means that will allow for > STP packets tunneled over a L3 network?
Well, *working* L2TPV3 and *working* EoMPLS will certainly do so...
This is just buggered software.
L2 tunnels should be fully transparent (or configurable which packet
types to forward and which not).
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpARfywbiyLj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
