On 11/03/2010 19:47, Tim Stevenson wrote:
It's always a tradeoff. Presumably, if we spent CPU cycles churning
through the RIB & deciding which entries could be "consolidated" (and
then dealing with route adds/deletes, interface flaps, etc in such a
scenario) then people would probably complain about how we chew up CPU
trying to optimize the routing table rather than just using a bigger TCAM.
Hope that helps,
Very much - thanks!
And it's a huge relief to see that %CFIB-SP-STBY-7-CFIB_EXCEPTION won't
cause your 7600 to turn into a 2800 :-)
Nick
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
