I looked at it again and noticed it's a combination of Netflow being
enabled and ACL Based RBSCP.
It's hard for me to tell without more data if it's an exact match or if
the fix is more generic.
The general recommendation for code direction in regards to 12.4T/15.0 is:
12.4(15)T as it will live a long time if you don't need newer features/hw.
15.0(1)M if you are on between 12.4(20)-(24)T.
Rodney
Eninja wrote:
Pete,
Get off the T train to 15.0. T train is too unstable to be run in _any_
production network and should _only_ be used when there is absolutely no
alternative.
Eninja
PS. Rodney, feel free to post the release notes of sv85009 so others can
be enlightened about its cause and effect. Tx
On Dec 2, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Pete Barnwell <[email protected]> wrote:
Rodney Dunn wrote:
From the 'sh stack' you posted offline it *appears* that this may be a
result of:
CSCsv85009 fixed in 12.4(22)T2.
I didn't spend a lot of time analyzing it but the code tracebacks you
sent me offline match up pretty closely.
Rodney
Thanks - I'm going to try upgrading it to 12.4(22)T2 and see if that
fixes the problem.
Regards
Pete
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
