harbor235 wrote:
Is anyone out there utilizing a collapsed P/PE in thier MPLS networks?
Yes. Every router in our network is a PE, though we an run enterprise rather than SP-size network (it is more like SP than enterprise in architecture though).
Do you regret deploying the architecture and what are the problem areas if any?
No regrets, no problems. We've a relatively small routing table and almost all of the CE adjacencies are "connected" subnets rather than dynamic routing neighbours. In that situation, separate P buys you nothing, and the rest of our network architecture doesn't need it.
I assume it's a dollar issue and as long as you have minimal PE to CE aggregation this is the way to go. However, if you need to scale this solution then the price per CE port can get costly on the single platform. Adding PE is cheaper than adding a P !! Can you migrate to a seperate P and PE easily ? thanx Mike _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
