Hi, On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 11:40:17AM -0800, Kevin Graham wrote: > Short of host-side implementation details such as one slow MSI-X queue > starving others, isn't this providing exactly the congestion feedback > that would be expected (queue-on-congestion, drop when queue > exceeded)?
so you have one ingress port ("the NAS"), 20 egress ports ("the clients").
Egress port 1 fills up.
What are you going to do? Flow-control (-> slow down 19 other ports)
or drop?
(For "3 ingress ports, 1 egress ports, bursty traffic that doesn't
exceed the egress port speed *on average*", the answer is different)
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpQZJh57RrCP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
