Hi Dave, I've been tried configure HQF but runing 12.4T IOS and didn't work. I'm going to get the 15.0 IOS and I'll try again with HQF.
Thanks 2009/11/21 Dave Cardwell <[email protected]> > Hi Alejandro, > > If you can run 15.0 code you may want try HQF, rather then CBWFQ. > > There is a good description at the link below: > > http://blog.ioshints.info/2009/11/first-hqf-impressions-excellent-job.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=RSS&utm_campaign=IOS+hints+Feed > > Hope it helps, > Dave > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Alejandro Selios <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks Clue for your quick answer. > > > > In the original mail I didn't mention it, but I applied the > service-policy > > to the PVC like you said. (Below attach the complete configuration for > both > > cases). > > > > Another issue is that Cisco's 800 and 1800 series routers only have 2 > level > > of prioritization. Cisco's routers allow to configure a priority queue > and > > CBWFQ (class base weighted fair queue) but does not has the flexibly to > > specify a scheduler policy or any other queuing policies. > > > > I think that weighted fair queue will leave as dead end, I think the way > to > > follow is a strict priority queuing with a customizable scheduler policy. > > I'm looking for a way to do that in Cisco's routers. > > > > I'll appreciate any help you can give me. > > > > > > Cisco 878/877 > > -------------------------------------- > > class-map match-all GOLD > > match access-group name GOLD_ACL > > class-map match-all SILVER > > match access-group name SILVER_ACL > > > > > > policy-map QoS_POLICY > > class GOLD > > priority percent 25 > > police cir percent 25 pir percent 25 > > set dscp ef > > class SILVER > > set dscp af41 > > bandwidth percent 50 > > shape average percent 75 > > class class-default > > fair-queue > > set dscp af12 > > bandwidth percent 25 > > > > interface ATM0 > > no ip address > > load-interval 30 > > no atm ilmi-keepalive > > max-reserved-bandwidth 100 > > ! > > interface ATM0.35 point-to-point > > description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO > > ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.254 > > atm route-bridged ip > > pvc 0/35 > > vbr-nrt 576 576 > > oam-pvc 0 > > encapsulation aal5snap > > service-policy output QoS_POLICY > > > > > > > > Cisco 1841 > > -------------------------------------- > > > > class-map match-all GOLD > > match access-group name GOLD_ACL > > class-map match-all SILVER > > match access-group name SILVER_ACL > > > > > > policy-map QoS_POLICY > > class GOLD > > priority percent 25 > > police cir percent 25 pir percent 25 > > set dscp ef > > class SILVER > > set dscp af41 > > bandwidth percent 50 > > shape average percent 75 > > class class-default > > fair-queue > > set dscp af12 > > bandwidth percent 25 > > > > policy-map SHAPER > > class class-default > > shape average 1000000 > > service-policy QoS_POLICY > > ! > > ! > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0 > > description INTERFAZ DE ACCESO > > no ip address > > load-interval 30 > > duplex auto > > speed auto > > ! > > interface FastEthernet0/0.100 > > encapsulation dot1Q 100 > > ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 > > service-policy output SHAPER > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/11/20 Clue Store <[email protected]> > > > >> Hi Alejandro, > >> > >> If you're doing this with xDSL, you will have to apply the > service-policy > >> to the PVC for outgoing to make it work. Here's an example of what I > use. I > >> know your class-maps and policy-maps are different, but you should be > able > >> to get the point. > >> > >> class-map match-any VoIP > >> match ip rtp 16384 16383 > >> match access-group name VoicePorts > >> > >> policy-map Voice > >> class VoIP > >> priority percent 75 > >> > >> class class-default > >> fair-queue > >> > >> > >> interface ATM0.1 point-to-point > >> pvc 1/100 > >> vbr-rt 384 384 > >> tx-ring-limit 3 > >> service-policy output Voice > >> > >> > >> ip access-list extended VoicePorts > >> permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025 > >> permit udp any host x.x.x.x range 22026 62025 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> HTH, > >> Clue > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alejandro Selios <[email protected] > >wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I want to configure QoS on a Cisco's 800 and 1800 series router and I > >>> couldn't make it work the way I want. I've configured three classes of > >>> service called GOLD, SILVER and BRONZE, designed for low latency, low > loss > >>> and data respectively. > >>> > >>> * I want the GOLD class to have a maximum bandwidth of 25%, even if > there > >>> is > >>> traffic in the other classes. > >>> > >>> * The SILVER class has a minimum bandwidth of 50% and, if there's no > >>> traffic > >>> in the GOLD queue, I want this class to take the available bandwidth > which > >>> is not used by the GOLD class. Thats means that the SILVER class has a > 50% > >>> of assured bandwidth and can increase to a maximum of 75% of the total > >>> bandwidth. > >>> > >>> * The BRONZE class has no assured bandwidth and can only take the > >>> bandwidth > >>> which is not used for the other classes. > >>> > >>> The problem is that with Cisco's QoS tools I have not reached the > desired > >>> goal. I have tried with different configurations and IOS and I couldn't > >>> get > >>> any successful result . Below I attach the policy configuration that I > >>> have > >>> tried (just to give you an example). > >>> > >>> Is there any way in which I can achieve the behavior that was described > >>> above?. > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance. > >>> > >>> > >>> Standard Configuration > >>> ------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> policy-map QoS_POLICY > >>> class GOLD > >>> priority percent 25 > >>> police cir percent 25 pir percent 25 > >>> set dscp ef > >>> class SILVER > >>> set dscp af41 > >>> bandwidth percent 50 > >>> shape average percent 75 > >>> class class-default > >>> fair-queue > >>> set dscp af12 > >>> bandwidth percent 25 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Hierarchical Configuration > >>> --------------------------------------------- > >>> policy-map GOLD+SILVER > >>> class GOLD > >>> priority percent 33 > >>> police rate percent 33 > >>> class class-default > >>> fair-queue > >>> > >>> policy-map QOS > >>> class GOLD+SILVER > >>> shape average percent 75 > >>> bandwidth percent 75 > >>> service-policy GOLD+SILVER > >>> class class-default > >>> fair-queue > >>> > >>> > >>> Note: This configuration was applied in a subinterface (xDSL, 802.1q > >>> ethernet) and for the outgoing traffic. > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > >>> > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp > > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ > > > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
