Hi all, We have an small issue here and we have over the table some workarounds and one them is related with the order of operations of the "set" directives under a route-map used for policy routing.
In fact we would like to apply a code like this: route-map selectvrf permit 10 match ip address foo set ip next-hop verify-availability 10.53.0.37 1 track 10 set vrf vrf_backup4foo We know that we could use "set ip next-hop verify-availability" and then "set ip next-hop" but we can't do that because under vrf vrf_backup4foo there is another 10.53.0.37. And we have some redistribution between VRFs and BGP... So it is not possible. So, the question is... Is there anyone here with information about the order of operations of the "set" directives under a route-map used for policy routing? Regards. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
