On Thu, 2009-08-27 at 12:51 +0200, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote: > Link-local IP's are fe80::/10, so I planned to use fe80::/16 in my > network just by replacing first 16 bits of our public IP's. > > Can anyone say whether this is bad or wrong idea? :)
VRRPv6 (on Junos at least) requires you to statically configure link-local addresses. We use the following scheme for each subnet: fe80::<group id>:1/64 = virtual fe80::2/64 = first router fe80::3/64 = second router (all done using a commit script btw, so no addt'l manual labour involved) We don't use HSRP (yet), but I guess you could employ this in an HSRP environment as well and just tell -all- your customers to point to fe80::X:1 as default gateway. --Daniel. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
