Phil Mayers wrote:
Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
Daniel Verlouw wrote:
No real experience with HSRP though, can anyone shed some light on that?
I understand it only works for link-local addresses?
Yes, unfortunately it is only link-local. I am just trying to figure
it out how to marry link-local with our global ipv6 assignments.
That's now the way it works AFAICT.
Basically, the routers still send router-advertisments. However, the
link-local address in the next-hop is the HSRPv6 virtual IP, and floats
between the active & backup.
So you only *need* the link-local.
But it is strange indeed. We tell everyone that v6 is just the same as
v4, but just the issues as above makes our customers scary.
So, we assign 2001:0db8:85a3:08d3::/64 on a customer port, with a
gateway fe80:0db8:85a3:08d3::1 - how does it look? Is it the same as we
do with v4? :)
Do you have any plans for such IP division? I just thought about
replacing first 16 bits of public v6 address with fe80, but maybe you
have better ideas.
--
Grzegorz Janoszka
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
