Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 07:33:40PM +0200, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote: > > > Well, I think that it's reckless to spend 4 globally routable IP > > > addresses instead of 1 per customer, when all you do is save a few > > > minutes of time per installation. > > > > As I said: our customers usually use many more IP addresses > > than just one. > > > > And, of course, you're welcome to join us in IPv6 land where > > this sort of "last century" thinking does not need to worry > > us any longer :-) > > Some of us still have to live with reality where IPv6 deployment is > negligible :)
You have it in your hands to change that.
Almost all traffic that goes into my home network or out of it is IPv6
these days - SSH to work, e-mails to and from work and to all the lists
on puck.nether.net (thanks, Jared :) ), www to google, ...
> ... And don't forget some IBM mainframes are still forced to
> run operating systems emulating 80-column card reader :D
Sure, some amount of legacy IP is going to stay - but these IBM mainframes
are not your typical web server anymore.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgpl7ywxG0hrJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
