Hi, On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:54:32AM +0100, Alexander Clouter wrote: > The sad part is that no one can get the in production experience of IPv6 > because the vendors do not support it. You generally have to make do > with what you can and use Linux as 'duct-tape' for the bits that are > lacking...
Oh, well, it's not *so* bad.
Some things are lacking, but the conclusion "the box cannot do radius
over IPv6 transport" == "not ready for production IPv6 deployment" is
not something I can agree to.
I expect that we'll have to run IPv4 in parallel for a few more years,
and if some parts of the device management functionality is not available
over IPv6 today, it won't stop us from offering IPv6 internet services...
> Wait till you stumble on the lack of an 'ND proxy' or 'RA guard' :)
Tell your account teams that you want it, and won't buy new hardware
unless they deliver...
OTOH - Cisco has working prototypes of SeND, while no other (!) operating
system out there supports it. So where's the Linux duct-tape when you
need it...?
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
fax: +49-89-35655025 [email protected]
pgp65ElidYib6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
