Hi, I have a 3750 CE device connecting to an FE port on a 6509 PE over a 100M WAN Link. The 3750 is running VRF-Lite, and a trunk exists between the 3750 CE and 6509 PE to provide VRF separation.
Configuration of the 3750 CE: interface FastEthernet 1/0/1.100 encapsulation dot1q 100 ip address 10.0.100.2 255.255.255.252 ip vrf forwarding VRF-100 ! interface FastEthernet 1/0/1.101 encapsulation dot1q 101 ip address 10.0.101.2 255.255.255.252 ip vrf forwarding VRF-101 ! interface vlan 10 ip address 10.100.0.1 255.255.255.0 ip vrf forwarding VRF-100 ! interface vlan 20 ip address 10.101.0.1 255.255.255.0 ip vrf forwarding VRF-101 Configuration of the C6509 PE: interface FastEthernet 5/1.100 encapsulation dot1q 100 ip address 10.0.100.1 255.255.255.252 ip vrf forwarding VRF-100 ! interface FastEthernet 5/1.101 encapsulation dot1q 101 ip address 10.0.101.2 255.255.255.252 ip vrf forwarding VRF-101 If I need to enforce QoS on a per-VRF basis, e.g. require a traffic class to be guaranteed a minimum bandwidth of (say) 5Mbps within VRF-100 between CE and PE, where should the service policy be applied? Can a hierarchical policy using shapers be applied to the sub-interfaces to achieve the desired result? Cheers, Matt -- Matthew Melbourne _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
