Indeed it is. I'm exchanging vrf routes with a router in another AS, and I want to enable RPF checks via a different path than the EBGP learned unicast path. The only other option I see is using static mroutes in the upstream router. Not exactly ideal.
-Josh On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Phil Mayers <[email protected]>wrote: > Gergely Antal wrote: > >> you need address-family ipv4 mdt >> and a separate vrf to carry the traffic >> > > I don't think that's what the OP wants. I think he wants a different > multicast RPF routing table for a VRF. > > I don't think you can do this (annoyingly) > _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
