Ryan Hughes wrote:
It "depends" - largely on the type of Multicast you're rolling out.
I had mixed results with 3560's running IP Base versus IP Services for
SSM/AutoRP roll out. Depending on your requirements you could maybe get IP
Base to work but best results were with IP Services.
Ryan
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Jeff Kell <[email protected]> wrote:
Chris Knipe wrote:
We're going through the same story at this stage. Working with allot
of vendors, testing, and trails. So far for us, a combination of entry
level 2960s and 3560s are working fine. You are correct, the most
important thing is Multicast and IGMP subscriptions, so pretty much
any half decent switch would be capable.
Reminds me... do you need the "LAN Base" version to make it fly, or will
"LAN Lite" work?
(or for the 3560s, IP Base or IP Services?)
Jeff
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
Hi
We use ME3400 with metro ip access image. ssm works perfect. Have a look
at the following links for some guidelines.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a00806b5b4c.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/products/ps6902/products_implementation_design_guide_book09186a0080665c4c.html
Anthony
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
