What's the purpose of having those additional addresses bound as secondaries? It's not needed for NAT.
Chuck -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ryan Goldberg Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 8:17 AM To: '[email protected]' Subject: [c-nsp] basic nat question I really did *not* want my first post to cisco-nsp to be this lame, but... if you have second- got an 1841 out there, with x.x.x.161/29 bound on the internet facing port, and .163, .164, .165 also bound as secondaries. need to do some static nat, but only the entries for the primary IP work eg ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.103 110 x.x.x.161 110 vrf ISP2 extendable works just fine ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.156 443 x.x.x.163 110 vrf ISP2 extendable does not work a clue that I'm unable to make use of is the traffic that I send to the secondary, comes back from the primary according to the nat trans table, and as verified by packet capture any help you could provide would be hugely appreciated running 12.4.24T.. Thanks- Ryan _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
