On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 16:30 +0200, Stefan de Konink wrote: > They could have done a better job scan/shoot every image per frame. That > results in a 3 to 10MP image per frame :) Then normalize frames, and > produce an image. > > In this way you would have 16bit Analog to Digital material, then edit > glitzes in Cinepaint per frame. > > > imho a much better use of OSS >
... absolutely, though much more expensive too! We didn't do the transfer from film ... we *bought* a mini-DV transfer from a stock footage house and started there ... I was only giving the provenance of the transfer to put the restoration in perspective ... --rob _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
