On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 15:26 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 07.03.2007, 10:20 +0100 schrieb Christian Thaeter: > Finally I found some time to look at some cinelerra bugs. Cinelerra use > > quite some own things...... > > > I believe the code complexity could be lowered by replacing some > > things with standard or defacto-standard libs rather fixing the problems > ... > > Hello Christian, > > I am much in favour of the cleanups you propose, indeed, many aspects > of cinelerra source are hard to work with... > > but, as I see it, the main problem is: > will such changes be accepted "upstream"?? > > If not, we will end up with a de-facto code fork. (I state this without > intending any pun or hostility). /If/ we wanted a completely forked > "Community-Cinelerra", we would need much more dev manpower....
...which we will never get unless the codebase gets cleaned up. I think Christians initiative deserves a "can do" attitude from the rest of us. :-) -- Herman Robak _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list [email protected] https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra
