I do not see a reason to do that. Moreover, I would love to have an option to create a new pinned tab when clicking on a link in a pinned tab (right click-->Open in a new pinned tab?). (For example, you start your day with Google Reader on and you go to GMail, but at the end of the day, you close GMail and leave Google Reader open at the end of your workday. Chrome remains open all of the time.)
But I guess my use case is uncommon. ☆PhistucK On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 16:14, Ali B. <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello > > I'd like to discuss the sense behind adding more restrictions to pinned tab > as opposed to the normal normal tabs. > > Right now, typing an address, performing a search or hitting the home > button would normally result in changing the location of the active tab, > whatever it was. Unless Alt or the middle button is used. While this sounds > reasonable for regular tab, it maybe too much for pinned ones IMHO. > > The reason is because my understanding of pinned tabs, besides the > technical fact that they will be "pinned" to the left side of the window, > minimized in sized and having their close button hidden, I think the real > benefit and the main use case for this feature is keeping aside tabs that > I'd definitely want to keep open (Think my Gmail). I would want these tabs > to be somehow preserved from being tampered with while I can browse freely > on other tabs. Therefore, what would you guys think of having a > different behaviour for opening new address when a pinned tab is the active > one? Say, defaulting opening the address in a new tab when pinned tabs are > active? > > -- > Ali B./dmondark > http://awhitebox.com > > -- > Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] > View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: > http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss -- Chromium Discussion mailing list: [email protected] View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-discuss
