Thank you for the clarification. How do we access DICompositeType: line numbers from Function &F or Module &M.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 9:43 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: > the location of composite types isn't stored in a DILocation - it's stored > in the 'file'/'line' attributes of the DICompositeType (similarly, the > members have a 'file' and 'line' attribute). > > See for instance line 39 of the LLVM IR in https://godbolt.org/z/o3oce5 : > > !12 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "Foo", > file: !8, line: 1, size: 32, flags: DIFlagTypePassByValue, elements: !13, > identifier: "_ZTS3Foo") > > Note the 'file:' and 'line: fields there. (the file field refers to !8 > which is !8 = !DIFile(filename: "./example.cpp", directory: "/home/ce")) > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 5:15 PM Bella V <bellavistagh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Thanks for the answer. >> struct Foo >> {int x;}; >> >> Void bar() { >> struct Foo f; >> f.x = 1; >> } >> >> I'm trying to access the DILocation for DICompositeType (Foo), that is >> the Source Location for struct Foo and struct members. Any pointers. >> >> Regards. >> >> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:20 AM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Not sure I understand the question - llvm.dbg.declare can be >>> queried/examined/etc through the usual LLVM IR APIs, yes - it's an >>> intrinsic call, with operands, etc. It's a DbgVariableIntrinsic ( >>> https://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1DbgVariableIntrinsic.html ) you >>> can interrogate for information. >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 7:17 PM Bella V <bellavistagh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thank you. Also Is there a pragmatically way to access the metadata >>> info for local variables within the llvm.dbg.declare. >>> > ( llvm::Value does not have local variables). >>> > >>> > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:55 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> You'd have to get IR from somewhere that has attached debug info - >>> such as clang -g >>> >> >>> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 1:22 PM Bella V <bellavistagh...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Do we have to initially attach some metadata to the Value? Because >>> in function pass, when I do F.getAllMetadata(MDs), i do not see any >>> metadata appending to MDS. >>> >>> F.hasMetadata() also returns false. What would be the way to get >>> debugLoc in these scenario? >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks and Regards. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:31 PM David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 4:33 PM Ayush Mittal via cfe-users < >>> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Hello Cfe Users, >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Could you please point to an effective way to get Source Location >>> details from an IR code. >>> >>>>> From the documentation, I think this could be a way: >>> >>>>> Function Pass-> LLVM Value-> MDN->DILocation-> Source Location. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Yep, that's about it (I mean, you can do it in a pass, or not - >>> but yes, find an llvm::Value and get the debugLoc from that) >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Please include any example if the above approach is correct too. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Thanks and Regards. >>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>>> cfe-users mailing list >>> >>>>> cfe-users@lists.llvm.org >>> >>>>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users >>> >>
_______________________________________________ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users