On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 5:55 PM Matthew Fernandez < matthew.fernan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hans, it’s challenging to give sensible advice/guesses without knowing > which test is failing. Maybe I missed this information in the replies > (please CC the list if you want follow up answers from more than just > David). > That's my fault - Hans not subscribed to the list, so the emails have to be approved by a moderator (me) & I hadn't gotten around to it. Approved them all so they should now show up. > I am not a GMP developer, but note that GMP is regularly tested with ubsan > and results are included at https://gmplib.org/devel/tm/gmp/date.html. > > On Oct 25, 2019, at 15:32, David Blaikie via cfe-users < > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > UBSan doesn't catch everything - you could also try ASan and/or valgrind, > etc. (MSan if you want, but that's a bit fussier/more work to use) > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 3:16 PM Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote: > >> That is the reason I tried the UBSan, but as it changes optimization, it >> does not wrok. >> >> >> > On 26 Oct 2019, at 00:14, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Yeah, coming across compiler bugs does happen - but more often it's >> bugs in input programs. (one of the reasons compiler engineers aren't >> likely to jump on reproducing and reducing misbehaving programs, because on >> the odds, it's not a bug in the compiler) >> >> _______________________________________________ > cfe-users mailing list > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users > > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
