On Wed, 7 Nov 2018 at 11:44, Jan Korous <jkor...@apple.com> wrote: > > > On Nov 7, 2018, at 7:03 PM, Werner LEMBERG via cfe-users < > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > > > >> The rule for determining when a base class function declaration > >> introduced by a using-declaration is hidden by a derived class > >> function declaration does not take the template parameter list into > >> account: http://eel.is/c++draft/namespace.udecl#15.sentence-1 > > > > Our main lilypond developer disagrees. He writes: > > > > This link states: > > > > When a using-declarator brings declarations from a base class into > > a derived class, member functions and member function templates in > > the derived class override and/or hide member functions and member > > function templates with the same name, parameter-type-list, > > cv-qualification, and ref-qualifier (if any) in a base class > > (rather than conflicting). > > > > The parameter-type-list is a different one in this example since > > they contain a different member function pointer type. Which is the > > reason we need the whole hooplahoop in the first place. > > > > Isn’t it template-parameter-list that is different rather than > parameter-type-list? > > http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.fct#def:parameter-type-list > http://eel.is/c++draft/temp#nt:template-parameter-list
Yes. The pieces are these: template <typename T> // template-parameter-list void f (int N) // parameter-type-list Both base and derived function template have a parameter-type-list of (). :( > For context, the whole lilypond thread starts at > > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2018-11/msg00019.html > > > > > > Werner > > _______________________________________________ > > cfe-users mailing list > > cfe-users@lists.llvm.org > > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users > >
_______________________________________________ cfe-users mailing list cfe-users@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-users
