mclow.lists added a comment. Thanks for doing this, but it needs tests before it can land. If I were to define `class contract_violation {};` that would pass the tests you've provided. (Heck, if I removed the entire definition of `contract_violation`, it would still pass.)
================ Comment at: include/contract:41 + +class contract_violation { +public: ---------------- Needs `_LIBCPP_TYPE_VIS` Repository: rCXX libc++ https://reviews.llvm.org/D49647 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits