ioeric added a comment.

Thanks for the review!



================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaAccess.cpp:1871-1873
+    // The access should be AS_none as we don't know how the member was
+    // accessed - `AccessedEntity::getAccess` describes what access was used to
+    // access an entity.
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> This seems to contradict the function-level comment that says the check seems 
> to only take the access specifiers into account and not how the member is 
> accessed.
> not how the member is accessed.
It's not very clear to me what exactly this means.  But I think we are still 
not taking how member was accessed into account. The access in `DeclAccessPair` 
describes how a member was accessed, and this should be None instead of the 
access specifier of the member as we don't have this information here. 

I updated the wording in the comment to make this a bit clearer.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp:1316-1317
+        //   void D::f() { this->^; }
+        // The completion after "this->" will have `InBaseClass` set to true 
and
+        // `Ctx` set to "B". We need to set the actual accessing context (i.e.
+        // naming class) to "D" so that access can be calculated correctly.
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> This makes it sound like the caller has messed something up, but I'm also 
> pretty unfamiliar with the code completion logic. Why would `InBaseClass` be 
> true for that completion point and why would the context be set to `B`?
It's a bit messy, but this is roughly how lookup inside a class, say D,works:
1. lookup inside the class (InBaseClass = false, Context=D).
2. Run the same lookup on all base classes (InBaseClass=true, Context=B). 
(https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/master/lib/Sema/SemaLookup.cpp#L3584)

So, `InBaseClass` would be true when a lookup starts from a derived class. 


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D49421



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to