simark added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D49265#1163740, @dblaikie wrote:
> Any chance this can/should be unit tested? (also, in general (though might > not matter in this instance), symmetric operators like == should be > implemented as non-members (though they can still be friends and if they > are, can be defined inline in the class definition as a member could be), > so any implicit conversions apply equally to the LHS as the RHS of the > expression) Of course, I'm on it. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D49265 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
