baloghadamsoftware accepted this revision.
baloghadamsoftware added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

LGTM! But wait for Artem's acceptance before submitting.



================
Comment at: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/CStringChecker.cpp:311
+    if (!Filter.CheckCStringOutOfBounds)
+      return StOutBound;
 
----------------
dkrupp wrote:
> NoQ wrote:
> > Could we preserve the other portion of the assertion on this branch? I.e., 
> > `assert(Filter.CheckCStringNullArg)`.
> > 
> > Additionally, do you really want to continue analysis on this path? Maybe 
> > `return nullptr` to sink?
> I was unsure whether to return nullptr or StOutBound. I thought that 
> alpha.unix.cstring.OutOfBounds is in alpha because it may falsely detect 
> buffer overflows and then we would cut the path unnecessarily.  
> But OK, it is safer this way.
> 
> I could not put back the assertion, because if only unix.Malloc checker is 
> enabled (and CStringOutOfBounds and CStringNullArg are not) the assertion is 
> not true.
> 
I think the assertion could be preserved after the early exit, but it has no 
point to repeat the same condition in subsequent lines.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D48831



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to