svenvh added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaExprCXX.cpp:2030
+      }
+    }
 
----------------
rjmccall wrote:
> Anastasia wrote:
> > svenvh wrote:
> > > rjmccall wrote:
> > > > I think a better interpretation of this rule would be to just error on 
> > > > attempts to use the standard non-placement operator new/delete instead 
> > > > of trying to outlaw the operator declarations.  For example, I don't 
> > > > know why a user-defined non-global operator new would be problematic.
> > > Good point, I have raised this with Khronos, so I will hold this off 
> > > until we have clarification.
> > The decision by Khronos is to allow all user defined new/delete operators 
> > (even global). I have submitted the change to the spec. The next publishing 
> > date is however in July.
> Okay.  I agree with your decision in this patch to treat this as a defect in 
> the spec and thus to go ahead and do the right thing now.
I can postpone committing this until the revised spec has been published, if 
that's more desirable?


https://reviews.llvm.org/D46651



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to