EricWF added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45015#1121581, @ahatanak wrote:
> Could you elaborate on what kind of changes you are planning to make in > libc++ after committing this patch? Libc++ shouldn't actually need any changes if this current patch lands. Currently libc++ is in a "incorrect" state where it generates calls to `__builtin_operator_new(size_t, align_val_t)` when `__cpp_aligned_new` is defined but when aligned new/delete are actually unavailable. If we change `__cpp_aligned_new` to no longer be defined when aligned new is unavailable, then libc++ will start doing the right thing. See r328180 <https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/commit/a83128739983c83eaf1ba4c2bc0e3aa570082d15#diff-bd538fe75403fdbc4de9a1b97bc7c283> for the relevent commits which made these libc++ changes. https://reviews.llvm.org/D45015 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
