craig.topper added inline comments.

================
Comment at: include/clang/Basic/X86Target.def:295
+CPU_SPECIFIC("pentium_iii", 'H',
+             (1ULL << FEATURE_CMOV | 1ULL << FEATURE_MMX | 1ULL << 
FEATURE_SSE))
+CPU_SPECIFIC("pentium_iii_no_xmm_regs", 'H',
----------------
Could we just make the features a comma separated string? Then we wouldn't need 
a third version of EmitX86CpuSupports? Yeah it would incur string processing 
costs, but is that a big deal?


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:9214
+    return MultiVersioning::Target;
+  else if (FD->hasAttr<CpuDispatchAttr>())
+    return MultiVersioning::CpuDispatch;
----------------
No need for else after return.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:1901
+    const TargetInfo &Target = S.Context.getTargetInfo();
+    if (llvm::find_if(Cpus, [CpuName, &Target](const IdentifierInfo *Cur) {
+          return Target.cpuSpecificManglingCharacter(CpuName) ==
----------------
Maybe use llvm::any_of since you don't actually care about the iterator 
returned.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D47474



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to