ilya-biryukov added a comment.

Sorry for delays with this patch, I somehow missed the email notification about 
it.

> Expounding on my concerns a bit -- I'm worried about all the other places 
> calling isUndeducedType() and whether they're also at risk and thus a better 
> fix is to change isUndeducedType() to pay attention to the language mode.

I thought semantics of `isUndeducedType()` is actually what's most callers 
(e.g. diagnostics) want. That is "the type is undeduced **and** not dependent". 
But the name can definitely bring some confusion, so there might be other 
places that misinterpreted it.

@rsmith, it would be great if you could take another look when you have time.



================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:12609-12610
       return false;
+    // We can't simply call Type::isUndeducedType here, because it returns
+    // false on C++14's auto return type without trailing return type.
+    DeducedType *DT = FD->getReturnType()->getContainedDeducedType();
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> I don't think this comment captures the problem. Rather, I think the problem 
> is that in a template we deduce the `auto` to a dependent type, so it's not 
> considered "undeduced" at the point when we ask this question.
Thanks! That definitely explains the problem in a proper manner.


================
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:12612-12613
+    DeducedType *DT = FD->getReturnType()->getContainedDeducedType();
+    if (DT && DT->getDeducedType().isNull())
+      return false;
+  }
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> Is there any need to check whether the type has been deduced here? It seems 
> simpler (and equivalent) to turn off skipping for functions whose return type 
> involves a deduced type regardless of whether deduction has been performed 
> already (which it hasn't).
Thanks! I misinterpreted the deduced type's semantics. I thought it also 
appears in the following case:
`auto foo() -> int {}`
But it doesn't.


Repository:
  rC Clang

https://reviews.llvm.org/D44480



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to