bruno added inline comments.

================
Comment at: test/Preprocessor/headermap-rel.c:2-3
 
 // This uses a headermap with this entry:
 //   Foo.h -> Foo/Foo.h
 
----------------
dexonsmith wrote:
> Should we delete this comment now that the header map is human-readable?
Sure!


================
Comment at: test/Preprocessor/headermap-rel.c:6
+// RUN: rm -f %t.hmap
+// RUN: hmaptool write %S/Inputs/headermap-rel/foo.hmap.json %t.hmap
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -E %s -o %t.i -I %t.hmap -F %S/Inputs/headermap-rel
----------------
dexonsmith wrote:
> Should there be some sort of `REQUIRES:` clause for using `hmaptool`?
Not really needed, `hmaptool` is setup to work just like `clang-rename` and 
others, it will always be available to be used by lit. Additionally, it's not 
importing any module that isn't in the python standard library.


https://reviews.llvm.org/D46485



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to