GBuella added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D45616#1093514, @efriedma wrote:
> There is no difference between "signalling" and "non-signalling" unless > you're using "#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS", which is currently not supported. > Presumably the work to implement that will include some LLVM IR intrinsic > which can encode the difference, but for now we can ignore it. Does that mean, it is OK to generate the `vcmpltpd` instruction for both of these intrinsic calls: _mm_cmp_ps_mask(a, b, _CMP_EQ_OQ); _mm_cmp_ps_mask(a, b, _CMP_EQ_OS); ? In that case we can lower both of these to `fcmp olt`. I'm still not sure, if this is what a user would expect... Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D45616 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits