CarlosAlbertoEnciso added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D46190#1083502, @rsmith wrote:
> This is already the correct outcome. Both typedefs are referenced; this is > correct because they are named by the source code. Neither typedef is marked > as "used"; this is correct because a typedef cannot be odr-used. I appreciate very much your explanations on the typedef case. My misunderstanding comes from my experience with a commercial C/C++ front-end, which has the concept of 'needed' and 'really needed' and those concepts seems different to the 'referenced' and 'used' in Clang. I was trying to match that concept: needed -> referenced. really needed -> used. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D46190 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
